STORY CASEFILE2,012
DOCUMENTARY STORY INTELLIGENCE

Stories We Tell

A family mystery that turns the manufacture of memory into its true subject.

DirectorSarah Polley
Year2,012
Runtime108 min
01

THE STORYTELLING PROBLEM

How can a filmmaker investigate family truth while acknowledging that memory and authorship distort it?

02

THE STRUCTURAL SOLUTION

Expose the machinery of storytelling and use fabricated home movies to destabilize the authority of images.

03

STRUCTURAL MAP

01Portrait

Build Diane Polley as a vivid center through many loving accounts

02Question

Allow inconsistencies to suggest a concealed family history

03Investigation

Pursue paternity through competing narrators and documentary process

04Revelation

Resolve the biological question while expanding the authorship problem

05Fabrication

Expose apparent home movies as constructed images

06Polyphony

End with ownership of the story permanently unsettled

04

INFORMATION-RELEASE STRATEGY

The film initially allows archive and testimony to behave conventionally before revealing that some of its most persuasive images were fabricated.

Solving paternity does not conclude the story; it transfers the question from what happened to who has the right to shape what happened.

The filmmaker's own construction becomes evidence rather than a hidden mechanism.

05

CHARACTER SYSTEM

Sarah Polley

Investigator whose authority becomes one of the film's questions

Diane

Absent center built differently by every person who loved her

Michael and Harry

Competing authors whose emotional claims resist simple hierarchy

The family chorus

A polyphonic memory system that prevents definitive ownership

06

EVIDENCE SYSTEM

Family interviews

Contradictory affection and perspective

Authentic archive

Material connection to an absent woman

Fabricated Super 8

A test of the audience's trust in photographic evidence

Recorded narration

The father's authored version visibly directed by his daughter

07

METHODS IN THE FIELD

METHOD 01

Expose the act of construction

Transparency about construction can deepen rather than weaken emotional truth.

METHOD 02

Complicate the filmmaker's authority

Family stories belong to multiple narrators at once.

METHOD 03

Make memory polyphonic

Transparency about construction can deepen rather than weaken emotional truth.

METHOD 04

Reveal fabrication strategically

Family stories belong to multiple narrators at once.

08

WHAT AN EDITOR CAN STEAL

01Transparency about construction can deepen rather than weaken emotional truth.
02Family stories belong to multiple narrators at once.
09

APPLY IT TO YOUR FILM

  1. Whose version currently controls your family story?
  2. Could revealing construction deepen rather than damage trust?
  3. What question remains after the factual mystery is solved?
  4. Are different narrators allowed genuinely incompatible ownership?
  5. Does your evidence look more certain than it really is?
10

FOLLOW THE THREAD

The Thin Blue LineShirkersCollective

THE BUREAU OF HUMAN AFFAIRS

Observe. Document. Preserve.

Join the Archive.

Receive one new Field Manual each week.

© 2026 Bureau Records Office

PUBLIC ARCHIVE / HUMAN AFFAIRS